Some after thoughts.

To make it a bit shorter, I say that if you are not yourself a trained and skilled programmer of code, i.e. not able to create artificial intelligence in programming language, you are exposed to the weal and woe of those who can and whom you cannot control. They can, because you cannot check for yourself whether their code promises what you hope it will, provide AI applications that do something else not foreseeable by you. That possibility is potentially always there.
Basically, all technology that I haven't really penetrated and understood myself is something that I can't replicate myself. Since I cannot, and since the aspiration to understand everything in which I myself have no training is futile effort, since I can never fully penetrate the numerous disciplines that have arisen through the complex division of labour, the only thing left for me to do is to accept my limited understanding and to behave situationally, that is, to declare the present to be the main work of all my action and omission.

Another question that I find fundamentally dangerous to ask is: If by coming paradise you mean something that only the "good people" will experience, but what happens to those you identify as evil? Are they to be killed? But if you cannot kill them and you cannot punish them in person, that is, by your own hand, you can only hope for a change in their disposition. That "evil" will disappear from the face of humanity by some apocalyptic event is less than a hope, it is rather a frightening notion, for no evil can be separated from a good, like the rotten from the fresh tomatoes. There is no one who could do that factually, but can think such things only ideologically.