No, to getting cheap energy, be it hydroelectric, be it geothermal or simply conventional means of striking partnerships and alliances in traditional energy imports/exports.

So far, I haven't gotten much further than thinking that none of the solutions are particularly cheap unless you implement them on small-scale applications, not large-scale ones. Hydropower can only be used where there are flowing water bodies or adjacent water bodies (coasts). I know far too little about both, hydro- and geothermal energy. Whether it is cheaper, I don't know, I have too little expertise for that. What is it that makes hydro-power hydro-electrical power?

What do you think about the gigantic construction of dams or nuclear power plants? Are you moving away from the central supply idea and advocating smaller supply solutions? For example, compared to the many cells that form the whole? Instead of a giant central that wants to make all other local units dependent on it? For example, by letting each individual building "look after itself"?

People as a whole are resourceful and ideas are bulletproof, so a few good ideas and a determined group of individuals is the elites worst nightmare, it seems these people are our adversaries but in all the lame and pathetic ways you can think of, by blackmail and treachery is how they advance, completely self destructive.

You have to have or make time for reflective thought and not be stressed, I think. It seems to me that those who are caught in the hamster wheel have a very narrow focus. Both among the elites and the average person.