Since when is a proposal or thesis unscientific? Or what do you mean by Scientism?

Science is initially based on assumptions, on the basis of which it is formulated into theses and hypotheses.

I would understand if you said that this paper in particular does not interest you further and that you therefore do not want to read it.

I don't know if there are living beings that have been "proven" to have consciousness but "no magnetic field." You would have to, in order to point out a false statement to the author, confront him if you are serious and hear what he has to say about it. My interpretation is that it can't even be about saying he's making a false claim yet, it seems more like a lead-in waiting for further experimentation.

I have considered this text from the outset as a suggestion that first allows for a scenario. On the basis of which experiments have been made.

That is what I meant above. If there is no open-mindedness or further interest in such research and the experiments that are possible with it are financed, no scientific community that can be taken seriously can be formed in this area and it is kept small.