The obviousness of this publication not being a serious scientific text deserves to be addressed with either humour, thoughtfulness or artistic intent. The guardians of the science tag, however, who do recognise this, cannot help but mention that the wit (or drama, as the case may be) is based on false information.

This is like telling an artist who exhibits his painting that his work, which makes use of the knowledge of his time, is not one hundred per cent accurate representing physics or you name it. LOL :D