I don't want to commit to anything in the meantime. To take a somewhat cynical view, I would say that neither one nor the other is perceived by people as catastrophic. The percentages of deaths seem to be perceived as tolerable on both sides (deaths from Corinna and deaths from vaccination). What I mean to say is that proportionally to the large number of people, very few die from one or the other. The issue of "long-term consequences" cannot really be determined either, because everything that appears as an illness in someone in the long term cannot be answered in a monocausal way at all and is, in my view, rather ideologically or emotionally charged. In my own circle of real acquaintances, there are no disproportionately high numbers of deaths within the last two years, so there seems to be no real reason for panic. There is a mix of vaccinated and unvaccinated here, with an overhang towards the vaccinated status.

However, in my assessment, the perceived dangers exceed the actual ones. I think that the fear of the consequences of social ostracism is the greater on both sides, but the belief that it is the other way around trumps the social fear.

I don't know that, of course, and I have no ambition to prove it.