Hi to you,

I would appreciate it very much in reading your answers on the following questions.

Scientifically, it is not the things that confirm a theory, but the anomalies, those that challenge it.

With this in mind, how do you answer the question that there is little that challenges virus theory in the publications, but a lot that confirms it?

How familiar are you with the history of virus theory science or have you read scientific papers that deal with it controversially?

When you started your career, did you automatically assume that the theory of viruses, as commonly accepted today, was proven beyond doubt?

Within your university or other education, did you discuss anomalies, work that contradicted mainstream science, integrate it into the curriculum? What about outside of it?

Have you personally never had any doubts about virus theory? If not, could you give a reason for this? If yes, what would it be?