If I understand this correctly at all: this suggests that an AI - or any other entity - can know more about me than I know about myself. Knowledge of and about oneself is, of course, deeply subjective and full of paradoxes. AIs are not able to process paradoxes. At least not in the abysmal and humorous way that we humans are. If they were capable of doing so, they would not be AI but humans. Analogies are really great, but ultimately analogies. Nothing resembles anything else in an exact way. These tiny to large differences in the nature of all living things are what make a difference. There is nothing in the world where you can consider one thing absolutely proven down to the last factor. After all, mathematics, however good it may be, can never include all factors with all other factors in one calculation. The search for the world formula is therefore as pointless as it is megalomaniacal. Although it certainly has many a beautiful and surprising effect when one deals with such things.