RE: RE: PFT EXCLUSIVE: MAN ASSAULTED AND “ARRESTED” BY CANADIAN TIRE EMPLOYEES FOR EXERCISING MASK EXEMPTION!!!
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: PFT EXCLUSIVE: MAN ASSAULTED AND “ARRESTED” BY CANADIAN TIRE EMPLOYEES FOR EXERCISING MASK EXEMPTION!!!

Words
776
Reading
4 min
Listen
Play
6y

can it be possible that those in the ultimate power do not like that and all of a sudden now there's an even more powerful version of the virus floating around in those states? In reality if this was really about a great reset then someone(s) deliberately release this virus? Right? If one virus isn't enough why not two? three? four?

This scenario assumes that everything can be controlled: Viruses like humans like plants, animals, etc.

Do you believe that people can produce such excellent bioweapons that exactly match their own targets and hit exactly what they hope to hit?

I mean, really think about it: If you think such a thing is possible, what would be the job of the scientist hired to do it? Invent a virus that is deadly but doesn't kill everyone? It should only be very dangerous for the over 80s, but not for children or younger people? And then this agent tries it and fiddles around with rats and other mammals, when they get infected and how, what other conditions have to be there for the respective chosen old animals to die selectively, or how? In the process, of course, this so-called researcher also knows which of his experimental animals are pre-diseased, whether they have particular weaknesses or strengths, and he tinkers on and on until he finally claims to have found the right cocktail. Thereupon he is rewarded and then others come along who go off and .... and ...

what do they do? They inject themselves (haha) or are they secret agents among the doctors who inject small children and sick people without anyone knowing about this new cocktail? Or do they inject some animals and hope that they will infect people? How would such a deliberately manufactured virus actually be circulated?

So my guess is: not at all. Firstly, because I don't believe in the infallibility of virus research, and secondly, because it would basically be too much trouble to produce something like this reliably without masses of human subjects; animal experiments or not.

On the other hand, it is much easier to pretend that there is a deadly virus, hammer penetratingly and consistently into people's heads that we are dealing with a plague and they will believe it, so bombarded by the media. Then, subsequently, give them a vaccination and millions of volunteers emerge to accompany the latest human experiment.

Can all this be "on purpose"? I don't know and I don't actually think so. I guess it has to do with how we modern humans believe in threats and technology nowadays. Those ones, who have the power and means to do what they think is right, indeed may think that what they do is humanly correct. They believe their own stories and may fear overpopulation, environmental pollution and that man destroys his own habitat. Now, inwardly those characters or parts of their personalities think that they must do something about these miseries. Save the world from what they think is a threat.

Only, nothing will come of it, just as it did before the experiment, as incidentally with all so-called cures that are supposed to bring salvation, that is, once and for all, and promise to eradicate something. These things change absolutely nothing about the fact that people die, with and without prior illness, unpredictably and unexpectedly, just as they do not die even though they are old or ill. What remains is the eternal fact that the old die more than the young.

But a mass death that is supposed to be caused by a virus alone is not realistic, because there is hardly anything on earth that causes such unilateral deaths in masses. The masses have always died because people have helped them along, through warfare, the use of machine fire and bombs, prison camps, the denial of shelter and food. Once whole peoples are plunged into misfortune, they are weakened and beaten (physically or mentally), their zest for life, their courage is at an all-time low, their biological as well as spiritual powers weaken, mass deaths seem to occur.

The fact that, for example, soldiers died at the time of the Spanish flu, at a time when millions of people were still stuck in filthy war trenches shooting at other people, millions were killed in combat and exposed to deadly gases, etc., is something people seem to forget when they talk about viruses and their omnipotence to kill.

and ... maybe modern people are so bored that they need and want something exciting, a new threat which kind of gives them something "meaningful" to do. "Saving lives" or "reduce egoism" or whatever.