There are several identity mechanisms that have been proposed claiming to be able to prove an account is run by a single human being, to identify that single human such that they cannot have multiple accounts,

I am so glad that you got it! People think of themselves that they can be anything in one person: a police officer, an arbitrator, a judge, a juror AND an ethically mature person. That is impossible. In

Every stake holder is responsible for downvoting and protecting their investment. Read that linked comment from my former response, in order to understand me - maybe afterwards you know what I am talking

Hey! You do read my posts! LOL HaHa! LoL :D - you know that I do. But, can we have juries of our peers instead of professional committees or judges? However you recruit them, this is the weakest point

Are you or are you not compensated for your witnessing activities? Do you run a server and do you participate in the voting process on planned code changes/hard forks, yes or no? This is true for every

I am not barking but enjoying to talk to you. And wanting to have a reasonable dialogue. Let me ask you again: since the code is inevitably related to issues such as the features that create an impact

P.S. So if you want to keep your crypto income, but you don't want to do politics anymore because you're either tired of your job or don't really understand it yourself, you're not entitled to that crypto

Are you a technician? If so, you are someone who keeps the technology you are responsible for up and running with your expertise and the use of hardware and software. You are paid to maintain a server

Don't be so vain. If you have countered abuse, and you have done it well, and what you've done can be held up to your highest possible standards, congratulations to you. Nothing to say against keeping

It is that supposed principles are being constantly contradicted, which are first proclaimed loudly and proudly and then broken with a downvote for not being able to stomach insults or differentiating

It would probably be more accurate to say that "policing" is something you - or others - say you don't want to do. But that's how the witnesses are understood. As what else? If your stake makes

I am glad to see you quoting Chesterton. He was such a poet and is one of my favorite authors.

It reads like a great romance. You have a gift to deal with it. :) I myself have nothing special what I can connect to "synchronicity". It is maybe, because I don't use that expression in daily

I just recently went to different stores and asked the sales persons how business is going. A very big chain of which I thought will close down their stores, did actually free itself from some shareholders

The more we avoid talking to each other, the less we are capable of talking to each other. The thing with one company having thousands of customers is that they will not sell their service cheap, if they

Furthering the deranging power of lawfare are biologically insuperable laws regarding majority it is actually impossible to be in compliance with all laws regarding these matters, facilitating arbitrary

Thanks. I was wondering, since I was raised protestant and we don't have that kind of traditional encounters with pastors. So, it is very interesting to hear if "confession of sins" is something

or thru confession to a priest or an ex-seminarian whom I trust I am very interested in that. Do you have someone like that near you? I mean, where you live? I would like to hear if the one you talk to

But for me nobody told or asked me anything, it's always been my own questions Could be seen that way. But whenever I felt the inspiration (or aggravation) to dig into something, it was because I have

A good take on the issue of maturing. Either we learn the lesson, or we’ll carry it with us, for as long as it takes to get it, wether it will be six or forty-four years or anything in between. Well said.