From: David Rivkin [email protected]
To: Andrew M Grossman [email protected]
Date: Jun 22, 2018 7:50 PM

Can you please send me WSJ op Ed. Tx

Sent from my iPhone

From: Grossman, Andrew M
To: Rivkin, David
Date: Jun 23, 2018 12:56 AM

Mueller’s Fruit of the Poisonous Tree

It makes no difference ho= honorable he is. His investigation is tainted by the bias that attended i=s origin in 2016.

By
Elizabeth Price Fo=ey
June 2=, 2018 6:38 p.m. ET
414 COMMENTS=/span>

Special counsel Robert Mueller's investigation may face = serious legal obstacle: It is tainted by antecedent political bias. The J=ne 14 report from Michael Horowitz, the Justice Department's inspector general, unearthed a pattern of anti-Trump bias by high-ranking =fficials at the Federal Bureau of Investigation. Some of their communicati=ns, the report says, were "not only indicative of a biased state o= mind but imply a willingness to take action to impact a presidential candidate's electoral prospects."=Although Mr. Horowitz could not definitively ascertain whether this bias =E2 directly affected" specific FBI actions in the Hillary Cli=ton email investigation, it nonetheless affects the legality of the Trump-Russia collusion inquiry, code-named Crossfire Hurricane.=u>

Crossfire was launched only months before the 2016 election. Its=FBI progenitors—the same ones who had investigated Mrs. Clinton =80 deployed at least one informant to probe Trump campaign advisers, obtained Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court wiretap warrant=, issued national security letters to gather records, and unmasked the ide=tities of campaign officials who were surveilled. They also repeatedly lea=ed investigative information.

From: Rivkin, David
To: Steve Bannon
Date: Jun 23, 2018 8:14 AM

Here it is.

S=nt from my iPhone

From: jeffrey E. [email protected]
To: Unknown
Date: Jun 23, 2018 12:00 PM

i htink weak thoughts?

From: Steve Bannon [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Date: Jun 23, 2018 2:44 PM

Big deal

From: jeffrey E. [email protected]
To: Kathy Ruemmler
Date: Jun 23, 2018 5:26 PM

exactly my view. on facebook =1 thought you might look at the recent Internet and privacy opinions =and pose some open questions. to be discussed . mark wan=s to bring the Internet to the rest of the world. . and health=are . . his wife is nice but boring. . what do you=see as the challegnes what does she or he see.. =C2 social

From: Kathy Ruemmler
To: Unknown
Date: Jun 23, 2018 7:11 PM

Yawn. And David Rivkin is a ha=k. Zero — and I mean zero — chance that a court woul= find a due process violation on these facts. Fruit of the poisonous=tree doctrine does not apply.

SHA-256: b595d96ed09ae6c850623a200912104e94448ffc5872023996fb530d05abf623
Source: https://www.jmail.world/thread/EFTA02549970?view=inbox
Doc ID: EFTA02549970