From: Rich Kahn

To: Adam Bly

Date: Nov 22, 2010 4:25 PM

Subject: re: due diligence

I would like your permission to speak to Walnut

Please advise

Rich Kahn

Rich, I'm not sure that's the best next move. I think Innovium before walnut. Vera and/or I will call you in the morning to discuss.

Sent from my iPhone

I do not want to hear the rosy picture from Innovium

I want to hear Walnuts interpretation whether or not it is tainted in your eyes

Please respond to my email regarding interest due

Rich Kahn

HBRK Associates Inc.

Rich,

I want to clarify what appears to be a miscommunication. This is not at all a question of whose perspective I want you to hear, Innovium vs. Walnut; of course you can gather all perspectives and formulate your own as part of your due diligence and I would be happy to facilitate any communication you seek. I raised this as an issue because of certain sensitivities and conditions expressed by Jeffrey that I want to make sure I abide by (as well as strategies that are already in motion). Let's discuss this on the phone in more detail.

Adam

Adam seems very insecure with me speaking with Walnut (see below)

Based on my previous email I think speaking with Walnut to hear their perspective is imperative

I know you said you were ok with this —just wanted to verify nothing has changed as Adam has inferred below

I find dealing with Adam very difficult has he is extremely childish and a terrible business man

Rich Kahn

SHA-256: 0faf0807de69aee3ef5879c75311316e3a5b804afd8fe879773f66456b3fd5ab
Source: https://www.jmail.world/thread/EFTA02411684?view=inbox