I am someone who does not believe in the use of violence to get one's point across to others. However, there is this one punk named Dean Withers who gets me so furious whenever I watch him on YouTube or anywhere that I feel like punching him in the face.
Mr. Withers likes to insult anyone who challenges him to a debate. I admit that sometimes I can use some harsh words in my articles against individuals whose opinions I do not like. However, this man is barely in his twenties, and he insists that he knows more than some of his opponents in debates that may even be older than his parents.
Mr. Withers can be best described as a pedophile-panic propagandist who is unable to differentiate fake pedophilia from real pedophilia. He believes that 16-year-old people have the mind of a slug and that their heads will drop off if they stray beyond their peer circles in search of sexual intimacy. Oh, brother!
1. Dean Withers' Support Of Draconian Sex Laws Pertaining To Teenagers
In his video below, Dean Withers argues that teenage minors are incapable of consenting to sexual relations with adults no matter how benign the age-gap relationship is. He doesn't even think that a 16-year-old juvenile is capable of giving consent to a 20-year-old adult in a state jurisdiction of the United States where sixteen is the statutory age of consent. This man is a real piece of work as you can see in his video below.
Dean Withers Argues Against Teenagers Being Able To Consent To Sexual Relations With Adults In Spite Of Evidence To The Contrary
I never thought that I could ever encounter anyone more annoying than Harry J. Sisson, but, lo and behold, Mr. Withers has taken that same honor. After seeing other videos of his on his YouTube channel, I have found that Mr. Withers claims to be anti-QAnon. If he really is so, he could have fooled me, because he seems to have no problem in spewing pedophile-panic propaganda from his mouth as he does in the video above. At times he doesn't appear to know what he's talking about.
Mr. Withers insists that 14-year-old girls cannot logically consent to sexual intercourse. You're wrong, Mr. Withers. The statutory age of consent is 14 years old in many European nations, and the people in those same nations get along perfectly fine with it.
Teenage girls that young consent all the time. If it is to be treated as statutory rape, it should not be a strict-liability offense but rather an intent offense requiring actual harm. Unfortunately, Mr. Withers doesn't leave this topic alone. He also insists that 16-year-old juveniles cannot consent to sexual intercourse, unless they're in a same-age or close-in-age relationship. The statutory age of consent in many state jurisdictions of our nation is 16 years old, and people get along with it perfectly fine.
Could Mr. Withers be one of those dunces that believe that the statutory age of consent should be raised to 35 years old everywhere in the world? What planet is he from?
Nobody is trying to normalize predatory behavior, except for Mr. Withers himself, of course, because he obviously has no problem with deadbeat teenage fathers that ruin the lives of underage girls. He thinks that same-age relationships among adolescents are infallible and that all age-gap relationships between teenagers and adults are evil.
Mr. Withers will someday get a dose of his own bitter medicine if the day ever comes that he goes to bed with a girl he believes to be of age and she turns out to be 14 years old. He’s in his early twenties, so he makes the perfect target for such an occurrence. He makes me want to give a round of applause to the concept of jury nullification in statutory-rape trials.
Mr. Withers is probably a Joseph Rosenbaum sympathizer despite that the late Mr. Rosenbaum sexually molested a 9-year-old boy, which would prove how hypocritical Mr. Withers is. Mr. Withers is the perfect example of American societal dogma. Everything is his way or the highway as far as he is concerned.
I don’t like people badmouthing President Donald J. Trump, because I voted for him thrice. However, by the same token, Mr. Withers is entitled to his own opinion, and nobody is forcing him to like President Trump.
What really annoys me about Mr. Withers is how he and his partner both sensationalize their stance on statutory-rape laws by infantilizing teenage female minors. In contrary to what Mr. Withers states, 18 is not a magic number. Teenage female minors do consent regardless of what society and the law have to say about it.
Mr. Withers? You don’t get to determine whether an adolescent can consent or not. Each situation is different and should be evaluated on a case-by-case basis rather than get generalized.
Mr. Withers? You’re the sick person in society, because you believe that teenage sex is a form of child molestation, when you are clueless about the realities of age-gap relationships between teenage girls and adult men. You figure that Mr. Withers must have lived a very sheltered life for him to believe in all the crap that comes out of his mouth.
My response to Mr. Withers' rhetoric about teenage-adult relationships is that sending people to prison for every little alleged proclivity, so to speak, is not going to turn our nation into a glittering paradise. I wholeheartedly don’t believe that incarceration is the answer to everything, especially when no real crime has been committed. Mr. Withers is another one of those social-justice warriors whose well-meaning ideologies could never serve the greater good.
If Mr. Withers was stuck into a time machine and encountered Alisha Dean after being transported back to 2008, she would have a field day with him and his name would soon be mud. In case you don't know who Alisha Dean is, she is the 13-year-old girl who fooled adult men into believing that she was 19 years old so that she could lure them into bed and get them into trouble with the law back in 2008. She had been doing so from the time that she was 12 years of age.
Throughout his video above and in other videos of his, Mr. Withers gets the definition of pedophilia wrong in making his points about the statutory age of consent. Then he brings up the Epstein Files, over which he seems to obsess.
Wow! I’d be interested in seeing Mr. Withers have a heated debate with Michael Tracey. Mr. Tracey would probably win the debate.
Not that I like the late Jeffrey Epstein or would ever defend him, but Mr. Withers has a deep-seated fixation about him. Below is a video in which Mr. Tracey talks about the late Mr. Epstein and how he feels about him.
Michael Tracey Provides His Theory About The Late Jeffrey Epstein
Now, I don't see eye to eye with Mr. Tracey on every single, solitary thing that he says about the late Mr. Epstein. However, I can wrap my head around his statements about him much more easily than I can wrap it around anything that Mr. Wither says about him. In simple words, I have much more faith in what Mr. Tracey verbally delivers to the public on this topic than I could ever have for anything that Mr. Withers fires out of his mouth.
If Charlie Kirk were still alive, he could probably put Mr. Withers in his place in fewer than five seconds in a debate. Mr. Withers is not the brain man that he perceives himself to be. He certainly seems to cherry-pick his opponents in debates to ensure that he has an unfair advantage over them.
Mr. Withers lives in his own make-believe world of age-appropriate perfection and wholesome purity. He preaches that he has no problem with two 16-years-old juveniles having sex with each other but that he cannot condone a 16-year-old juvenile having sex in any kind of age-gap relationship.
My response to Mr. Withers in that regard is that the proverbial cloak of same-age relationships and same-age sexual intimacy don't always guarantee a bed of roses to a teenage girl; and when an age-gap relationship produces better results for both partners than a same-age one does, it doesn’t say very much for the parents of deadbeat teenage fathers.
Our nation has no moral high ground to push high statutory ages of consent on its people, because it has become the deadbeat teenage dad capital of the world in that we have the most unwanted teenage pregnancies of any country in the world and we have an epidemic of deadbeat teenage fathers. You only have to take the example of how reprehensibly Levi Johnston treated Bristol Palin right after he discovered that she was pregnant with his son back when they were both teenagers.
Nobody can convince me that Levi Johnston and Bristol Palin had a better relationship than Matthew Koso and Crystal Guyer Koso did despite that Levi Johnston and Bristol Palin started out as two 13-year-old sweethearts, whereas Matthew Koso and Crystal Guyer Koso started out as an age-gap relationship in which one was an adolescent minor and the other one was an adult in his early twenties. Matthew and Crystal are still together, but Levi and Bristol never married each other; so put a sock in it, Mr. Withers.
For someone who proclaims himself to be a liberal Democrat, Mr. Withers acts fairly comfortable and cozy in his puritanical black hole of sheer ignorance. At the end of the day, Mr. Withers is a pushy punk who thinks he has the answers to everything, but he relies on biased news sources to form his opinions. He was probably another one of those male prima donnas back in middle school and high school who thought that he was holier than thou.
Now, don't get me wrong. I agree that the late Mr. Epstein was evil. However, while I do agree that the late Mr. Epstein was a tyrant, his scenario does not represent every case of underage sex involving teenagers that has ever existed. Saying that it does so is like alleging that every Salvadorian has been a member of the MS-13 gang, when any intelligent person knows that that could never be true.
What evidences that Mr. Withers is dumb and dense in the head is that he has a blind faith in the Federal Bureau of Investigation ("FBI"). Fact has it that the FBI is the most corrupt Federal government agency that has ever existed in the history of the United States. For that reason, even though I respect David Ducovny as a talented actor, I will not watch The X-Files.
2. Dean Withers' Glamorization And Endorsement Of A Domestic Terrorist
If you thought that Dean Withers' video further back herein was intellectually bankrupt, you're going to be even more disgusted with his video below. This man clearly has a severe case of Pedophile-Panic Derangement Syndrome. He has Trump Derangement Syndrome too, but that's another article for another time. He can't even get the definition of pedophilia right no matter how hard he tries. Of course, the problem is that he doesn't try to do so at all.
Dean Withers Gives An Honorable Shout-Out To A Domestic Terrorist Who Pretends To Be A Hero
According to the Fifth Edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders ("DSM-5"), the definition of a pedophile is someone 16 years of age or older that is exclusively or primarily attracted to a prepubescent child five or more years their junior that is generally under 13 years of age (under 11 years of age under certain circumstances). A pedophile doesn't lust after 17-year-old girls. A pedophile doesn't even lust after 16-year-old girls.
Does Mr. Withers care about any of these facts? He certainly doesn't seem to do so. In the video above, once again he infantilizes teenage girls. If a teenage minor fooled him into believing she was of age and seduced him, I’d be laughing at him and he’d be eating his own bitter words as the cops hauled him away in handcuffs.
I would like to write a horror script in which Mr. Withers dies and goes to Hell and is too cocky to realize that he’s down there as he argues with the devil over some trivial matter. And I don't even believe in Hell!
With respect to the accusations of President Donald J. Trump going into beauty contestants’ dressing rooms, allow me to give this one response. When I was a kid, there was a to-do in the news about female news reporters going into men’s locker rooms to interview them while they were still naked after a major football game on television. However, nobody accused these women of being perverts or committing sexual exploitation. Of course, that’s neither here nor there.
The problem I'm having with Mr. Withers is his insistence that teenage sex is child molestation, when it really isn't even when it involves something cross-generational in nature. Mr. Withers simply can never admit to being wrong about anything when he is undoubtedly wrong about something.
Mr. Withers thinks that insulting his opponents in a debate is going to make him look intelligent. It doesn’t. It makes him look like the jerk that he is. Mr. Withers is delusional as his opponent in the debate accused him of being in the video above.
Now, here is where Mr. Withers really shows his true colors as a hypocrite in his video above. Regardless of whether or not YouTuber JiDion is a pervert, he is clearly a domestic terrorist.
YouTuber JiDion sets up online sex-sting operations to catch adult men who travel to a certain location to meet teenage girls that don’t even exist. In other words, these men are guilty of nothing more than thought crimes at the most, and they only seek to do something that would be perfectly legal for a 15-, 16-, or 17-year-old boy to do or would be legal in most European nations.
If Mr. Withers is actually anti-QAnon as he implied in other videos of his on his YouTube channel, he should not be praising YouTuber JiDion for his online activities inasmuch as YouTuber JiDion is no different from any these QAnon freaks. None of them can seem to differentiate fake pedophilia from real pedophilia.
QAnon has been condemned as a domestic terrorist organization. YouTuber JiDion is no less of a domestic terrorist than any of them are. Therefore, it becomes no secret that Mr. Withers supports domestic terrorism.
YouTuber JiDion’s activities have nothing to do with stopping pedophilia, because teenagers are not objects of pedophilia; and obviously Mr. Withers ignorantly holds that teenage sex is child molestation. Now, who is the f-----g idiot here?!
What YouTuber JiDion does online and offline is entrapment, and none of the people he catches are child rapists despite what Mr. Withers may think. If anyone out there disagrees with me about YouTuber JiDion or my viewpoint regarding what is and is not child rape, then you are perfectly welcome to read "Rage of Consent" by Heather Corinna as well as the online publication titled The Paradox of Statutory Rape by Russell Christopher and Kathryn Hope Christopher. These publications will give you the facts about this same topic.
Unless we’re describing sexual predators that target prepubescent children, nobody on YouTuber JiDion’s videos has admitted to any child rape. Teenagers are not children, period. By decorating YouTuber JiDion as some kind of hero or dark avenger, Mr. Withers is only admitting that he endorses domestic terrorism.
If Mr. Withers really ever had a brain in his head, he would be pushing for people like YouTuber JiDion to require a private investigator’s license and to be compelled to read the two publications I cited above to counter any false allegations of pedophilia and child rape against anyone who is innocent of such falsehoods.
If anyone is harmful to society, it is Mr. Withers that is so; and he’s a f-----g idiot. You can fill in the blanks. I didn't want to use any conspicuously vulgar language herein. At the same time, I'm having difficulty containing my anger with this simpleton.
Norman Michael Achin can easily educate you on how perverse and deceptive these online sex-sting operations are no matter whether the police are conducting them or private "predator" catchers like YouTuber JiDion are doing so. Former Aberdeen City Councilmember Riley T. Carter from the state of Washington is one of many "predator" catchers that turned out to be the most dangerous hypocrite of them all.
Norman Michael Achin Describes How Damaging And Deceptive Proactive Online Sex-Sting Operations Are
Mr. Achin's two videos above go above and beyond in dispelling Mr. Withers' sugarcoated perspective of "predator" catchers and the likes. As you can see from watching both videos, Mr. Achin even has a more conservative viewpoint about teenage sex than I do.
If Mr. Withers can’t tell the difference between a small child under 11 and a teenager, then he has a twisted and sick mind. As the hypocrite that he is, he probably likes watching videos on YouTube like the one below; but he won't admit to it.
Foxy Teenage Girls Model Lemonade Fashion Trends That Are New
Mr. Withers? If you're reading my article here, I just want you to know that you are the definition of stupid.
Unless Mr. Withers can show that the late Jeffrey Epstein was somehow involved in the kidnapping of Madeleine McCann, the fact still stands that he never went lower than 14 years old in his shenanigans involving young girls. If that is so, then it disqualifies him from ever having been a pedophile or a child rapist.
The silhouette of the girl that Mr. Withers points out in a communication between President Donald J. Trump and the late Mr. Epstein could have been French. French women have small breasts. Duhhh!!!!
Mr. Withers takes President Trump’s friendly comment to a 10-year-old girl that he will be dating her in ten years out of context. She will be 20 years old then, so what is Mr. Withers trying to say?
No, Mr. Withers. President Trump did not sexualize a 10-year-old girl. He complimented her that she would grow up to be a beautiful young woman someday. There is nothing wrong with his doing that. Mr. Withers is attempting to demonize an innocent event into something that it is not. It only goes to show you that he has a one-track mind that clouds his better judgment and makes him a menace to others.
Was President Trump’s accuser a little kid or a teenager? Mr. Withers doesn't specify that one detail in his video above. Moreover, Mr. Withers does a great amount of speculating about public figures in his video above, which shows you precisely how clueless he is about reality.
3. Final Thoughts
While Dean Withers may have a very large ego, he doesn't have a very big brain. That is, if he has one at all. His comments are replete with conjecture. He misuses his hostilities against President Donald J. Trump to promote fake pedophilia in that he cannot get the definition of real pedophilia right.
The fact alone that Mr. Withers idolizes "predator" catchers, who are mostly domestic terrorists, evidences that he endorses domestic terrorists and he couldn't care less about the facts of anything. He is someone that is too proud ever to admit that he is wrong about anything. In that respect, he is equally as dangerous as a right-wing nut is, even though he proclaims himself to be a liberal Democrat.
American statutory-rape laws are a mockery of human rights and intellectual dignity. It is outrageous that an adult man can get into more trouble for having a harmless, consensual relationship with a 15-year-old girl than an underage boy can do so for brutally raping a teenage minor here in the United States. More men are going to prison for pursuing non-existent teenage girls from online sex-sting operations than ones that actually rape girls and women.
If Mr. Withers really cares about teenage girls, he should post a video on YouTube to denounce scoundrels like Levi Johnson, Jesse Mack Butler, and the nameless underage rapist of the late Aubreigh Wyatt for forcibly raping underage girls during their juvenile years. Of course, he's not going to do something like that, because there's nothing in it for him. He's all about drawing audiences rather than reporting the facts.
This article is copyright-protected.