In an ideal scenario, given the current set up:

1. It would make sense for @steemcleaners to have a funding proposal through the SPS. Whether or not stakeholders would support it is another story.

2. An easier solution is for private donors such as @adm to transfer liquid STEEM/SBD to them for expenses. Unfortunately, @adm is controlled by multiple entities, so it is unlikely that could happen.

3. A drastic solution is for a dedicated budget from annual inflation to anti-abuse efforts, but that would greatly centralize such initiatives. You'd need to introduce some sort of governance and whatnot or it will become problematic.

There are defintely other arragements that could work, but those are some examples.

It's never possible to expect people to do things for free for an extended period of time. So, the idea that they should have no funding is ridiculous.