Given your first reply, I think Graphtar replied exactly what everyone trying to help could have replied.

I saw you screenshot a card at 0.09 ==> 0.220 STEEM and another at 0.07 ==> 0.182 STEEM because that was the only thing we could see a that moment from your reply.

I also think this thread (about a contest) is certainly not the place to investigate any kind of display problem with card prices. I say it with no hard feelings.

You really should take your question to the discord, it will be easier to understand what you are meaning here right at first sight. On Discord we can zoom on pictures and see originals.

Here we can't even zoom on your picture examples.

So you may see an information that I just cannot see on your post.

Implying there are scams or something and throwing a bunch of non-zoomable pictures, is like saying there is a murderer somewhere and then throwing a picture of a deep fog and saying "look at him he is here!".

Invite link to Discord tech support here:
https://discord.gg/bzbkb8V

If you think the problem is serious, then please use a serious way to share it and investigate.


Trying to make my reply more useful to you, AFAIK I can think of a limited answer.

The problem you mention may be tied to the experience the card has and the varied experience systems the game had.

There seems to have been a previous "experience chart" on cards when Steem Monsters started. A level 1 card, with supposedly 1 BCX, mays actually be a card with 90 experience points, 40 points, 0 point, or 150 (not an accurate example, I was not there at the time) because 1 card adequates to different number of experience points, depending on foil and rarity. Again my values are here just to give you an idea. There are public API threads to check the actual experience values.

Some cards (possibly alpha edition, etc) may have superior experience even for the same level.

If I report this to your exemple, for instance the card at 0.09 may have superior experience than the card at 0.07 despite being at 1 BCX for our current usage.

It may have happened since the release of the market updates last month or one month before (not so far in time) where we could see cards so much better. The problem appears now because more old-time cards may be competitive with new ones I suppose.

That may also be the reason why sometimes at some levels and card foils, you combine cards and end up at 1/6 or 0/5 instead of 0/6.

What makes me think about this is that the card numerotation is also different in some examples if I try to read the cards references.

I know my numbers do not make sense, and I am certainly not an old-timer able to reply accurately.

But this is what I can reply about this situation here from what I can understand while dedicating some time into reading your situation.

In any case, your report seems to be good. You were really right to ask about it.

This may need some change, we could use more clarity on this situation, so please ask on Discord and see what the official answer would be!

Thank you hhh-fan.