First of all thanks for the relaxing audio that makes the reading more pleasant.

You touched on an interesting point that I think is important for the health of the platform, AI can be seen as a tool that facilitates many jobs and that can be very valid in different areas but definitely not here. Why not?

As I understand HIVE is a platform that rewards content creators, the author, the thinker, the one who has shaped his ideas by stamping them with his personality is the one who deserves the rewards, so.... If I generate content using AI it is the AI who should receive the rewards, otherwise it would be a scammer, but an AI has no brain and its content production is an automated process, that makes that even the AI itself finds no place in HIVE which is proof of brain.

But there is a certain mediocrity or laziness in some people who prefer the easy way. Unfortunately the nature of these tools threatens the health of the platform and for sure an avalanche of content generated by these will become more and more pronounced, I think the curators do a great job with the exhaustive verifications, however, they will have more and more work to do if the process is executed manually.

I don't know if there is a bot capable of flagging AI-produced content in HIVE but this could make curators' job much easier.