RE: RE: Nidhoggr Adjustment Proposal: Addressing Airdrop Balance and Improving Tactics
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Nidhoggr Adjustment Proposal: Addressing Airdrop Balance and Improving Tactics

Words
200
Reading
1 min
Listen
Play
2y

Im part of Ygg. I was part of the group buy that won the design for this card. So, I should be one of the people that got "screwed" by releasing this card at the state it was.
Honestly the card is terrible.

But I dont agree with this proposal. Changing 3 diferent aspects of a card at the same time is very careless. We might create the next Tofu.
Im not an "expert" but I know that changing that many things at once its not the way to go. Balance is a delicate thing that need testing and we cant just mess with it like this.

If you want to change a card you need to:

  1. propose a single change at a time
  2. PLAYTEST the card.

I cant emphasize point 2 enough. We are discusing this mainly because we have very limited playtesting, just a few teammembers in their free time.
We cant do this gain, dont make the same mistake twice.

Another important point to consider is that the price of the card doesnt really reflect how bad is it. This card is still more expensive than Elias and Risqurel and has a similar price point as Cryptic.

@eldon1: Im part of Ygg. | Ecency