The reason this film is on here is because I was directed to a thread and saw this film mentioned.
After finding it on YouTube, which is owned by Google, watching a bit and realising that it had been overlooked by people I connect with on Twitter who are either survivors of MKUltra type abuse or victims of zersetzung gangstalking, I tweeted it out. However, as with most things I decided to back it up first. It was a good job I did, and I would recommend to people to make as many secure, possibly offline backups of sensitive content, their own content and my content for future refence.
This issue appears to prove beyond doubt that while I am limited to around 200 followers and have been since 2009, this is because I am 'shadowbanned', people more often than not can't see my tweets.
However while my twitter growth defies statistics based on the average growth of a twitter account, let alone an account by someone with my breadth of subject matter in my posts, this indicates my account is shadowbanned, as does a simple check on a shadowban checker.
However my account has many 'invisible followers', and they appear to be from the most powerful, wealthy and influential sources apparently including, as you will read below, the top people at Google, the most powerful and among the wealthiest in the world. And you can be sure they are not the only ones among the technocratic elitists, deep state and invisible government.
So why doesn't everyone who follows my activity on Twitter, just 'follow'me, by clicking the link to follow, as would be most transparent, convenient and honest?
Well that would mean people could 'see' who follows me and this would give me that cache known as 'social proof' , acknowledging my 'cultural capital', and would give others a true sense of my worth as an artist, thinker and webdeveloper, and would encourage my ideas, experiences and my art to gain traction in society, something that has been denied me by decades of censorship and zersetzung gangstalking-zersetzung was first used by the East German secret-police and means the 'bio-corrosion' of ones life through harassment , stalking, set up failures in work and social life, slander, smears, surveillance , mobbing etc.
One of the main things I have experienced in this form of illegal no-touch torture is lots of little failures in things I do, especially online. This has taken many forms but is generally done in an attempt to 'wear me down', to dissuade me from participating in the limited online life allowed to me within the restraints of the shadowbanning across every social media site. (This when combined with cyberstalking and offline harassment can be quite unpleasant, or at least it was at first until I learned to 'harness' it.)
On this occasion I appear to have caught Google, owners of YouTube, those of the motto 'Don't be Evil' engaging in zersetzung and well, being evil.
Google did this by sabotaging my online activity with the apparent goal to make me appear to be somehow unreliable as someone to follow, by making it appear that I send out broken links.
This proves that the top executives at Google are following my Twitter activity with the intent to sabotage my actions, thus contributing to zersetzung gangstalking.
Thus they are aware of and complicit with the other actions such as the death threats against me and my partner, including that she will be murdered during an operation,the poisoning of my dog, the car driven at me, the sabotage of evry show I've ever shown my art in, the blacklisting of my artners job in the city the burglaries etc, etc. If they foll my Twitter account so closely to enable the above , how can they NOT know. Thus by complementing the programme in this small way, (not to mention previously delisting me from search engines, cyberstalking me etc) they are assisting and thus complicit with zersetzung which attempts to drive the victim to suicide and thus is attempted murder.
My opinion, Google ARE evil. If they were really all about freedom and against Nazis then surely they would be on my side?
Not convinced, well see what you think. I'd be glad to consider any other possible explanations.
It started like this.
...and within a minute or so, the link had been broken! Who except Google, the owners of YouTube could do that, and why else, to a film that had been up for ages, except for the fact that I had tweeted it out? So the story continued...
