egmracer01

You're completely right :)

We use high quality organic hemp (without seeds, not trim). A lot of the smoothness of the smoke depends on the flushing and the cure. I've meet farmers who spend more than six months curing their flower

Thank you! Basically there are different ways of harvesting, flushing, and curing the flower. These are processes every cultivator does. We've developed a replacement process to traditional techniques

Thank you for your suggestion. The list is updated:

I don't necessarily agree with that. My linear algebra isn't great but in probabilistic terms, if you know a solid prior, you should apply it to your model so it has to do less work.

I use this list to filter out common words:

That's a good suggestion. Here's the list of words I currently have ignored:

Thanks for the shoutout. If anyone has recommendations or ideas for things to build in the future, I'm all ears.

I don't know any algorithms already implemented using steem data. I do know that recommendation algorithms are plentiful and there are many implemented examples. In other words, repurposing existing code

What you're saying makes sense. I understand that you don't want to base the recommendations based on other users. I do think you need a specific way to characterize your feature vector though. N-grams

I think that's a great idea and another steemian is also thinking about it. Check out the conversation here: Essentially, I think there are many different recommendation algorithms and potential UIs. How

I agree with you that right now Steemit is pretty much a worse version of all its competitors. Steemit is worse than Reddit. DTube is worse than Youtube. DSound is worse than SoundCloud. Dlive is worse

I certainly agree that an online algorithm will be much preferable to something that depends on large one-off runs. It seems like you should also gather data from other users. Maybe a netflix like

I think that's a big part of the solution. If more people like yourself just contributed in consistent meaningful ways, people gaming the system would be less of a problem

What changes would you make?

I certainly want the community to help each other grow but since the platform is open and money is involved, people try to take advantage of the community. These people want to get the maximum money for

I think the big difference is that when you hold bitcoin, you are hoping that more people buy bitcoin so that you can sell it at a higher price than what you bought it at. With Steem Power, you can buy

I've built a couple tools that do basic word analysis (word cloud and sentiment) on a steemit account: You might be able to use this analysis to help people discover more content. For example, if you use

Survival of the fittest is not of itself a bad thing. In can be a very good thing if the "fittest" means who posts the highest quality content. Trying to fight the evolution and economic incentives

Well you might like this: You might also checkout I'm not sure if they work for every type of color blindness and they are pretty expensive but it'd be cool if they worked for you.