I want to use the fact that there is no life on the universe other than earth, it is based on the bible and facts.

Stating that there is no life other then on Earth as a fact, is not funded at all, its not a fact. A fact is something we can proof. Written words are not facts.

Am wondering what you will say when we discover real life somewhere else. Ok, you will tell me we won't, because its a fact that life only exists on earth. But wasn't it a fact that the sun was rotating around the earth with the earth as the centerpoint at some point in time, until Copernicus and subsequently Galileo told otherwise? And wasn't Galileo put in jail/house arrest for almost his entire life by the church because he said (and proved) Earth is not the centerpoint? And wasn't the church that said later on in time, that the Earth may not be the centerpoint of our solar system, ie agreeing to what science was proving? Am quite looking forward to the discovery of lifeforms on other planets and like to discuss with you your point of view when that happened. Will be quite fun :)

BTW, I even think the church said at some point in time, the big bang could be real. But it is God that created the big bang and through that created the earth.

Regarding conditions of a planet to sustain life. You forget about the dimension time. It could very well be that on a planet close to our own Earth, life did exist in the past. At quite a few planets we found water, one of the basic ingredients for life to exists, in what we know at least.

EDIT: I'll link in the Drake equation and explanation thereof to give another perspective on the likelihood of lifeforms to exist somewhere else in the universe. I didn't analyse the figures in your preso slide, but I think that is just a set of numbers to make a point, but likely not what scientists will a proof: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drake_equation