Moves like this are highly contentious and require vast amounts of propaganda and narrative management to work. The move against gold made sense because gold was the foundation of physical money and writing paper IOUs against gold was already commonplace.

None of that even remotely makes sense for Bitcoin. In order for it to even come close Bitcoin still needs to x100 in price from here. On top of that nation-states need to print fiat from it (aka transition from gold-standard to bitcoin-standard). Right out of the gate this logic completely breaks down because we haven't been on a real gold standard for 100 years. A transition to a Bitcoin standard is impossible in the current environment.

Also the executive order we are discussing was all about getting gold out of the custody of individuals and into the hands of institutions. Your original claim is that institutional centralization makes it easier to perform this operation, which is false because the operation always revolved around taking the asset from the individual.

So on the one hand everyone understands that institutions like Blackrock have huge pull and control the government in ways we don't even fully comprehend, but on the other hand Blackrock controlling Bitcoin means that the government, which Blackrock controls, is going to steal the Bitcoin... from Blackrock. Like nah we need to pick a lane here.