First of all, I'm a bit confused about how we got from there to here.
But whatever.

If I Goggle 'morality':

Morality is the differentiation of intentions, decisions and actions between those that are distinguished as proper and those that are improper.

The definition itself is based 100% on opinion and varying cultural standards. What is improper and what is proper requires opinions that have strong consensus, nothing more. Making the claim that they are definable and inarguable is easily proven wrong.

Would you steal bread to feed your family?

• Stealing is wrong.
• Starving in a world full of abundance is wrong.

The most basic philosophical questions prove that morality is cultural.

I can easily make the argument that factory farming animals is obviously amoral, and if you eat meat you're a piece of shit and you're going to hell. See how quickly that escalated?

I can easily make the argument that killing and suffering are completely necessary, because change is constant and evolution can't happen without these things in play. If everyone just got what they want they'd all be soft, weak, and completely vulnerable at all times. Life is robust. Nature doesn't care that we have to suffer. These things are not up for debate. Nature itself is not a person, and thus cannot be amoral.

So what many people are calling amoral, is actually completely neutral and the standard practice across the board. Making the argument that "that shouldn't happen", is a very risky statement to make. It's a very "be careful what you wish for scenario" because there's no telling what kind of butterfly effect would spin off of that result. People think they can isolate one variable without that affecting everything else. Again, provably incorrect.

Don't you find it interesting that you think you have the ultimate playbook as to what it right and what is wrong and there is zero wiggle room whatsoever? Speaking of "The Jews", that kind zealous rigid rhetoric could come from no other place than religious dogma. "We have all the answers." "Never question it."

So from that one single comment alone anyone can see that you are:

1. Not Jewish (even though there are Jewish people out there that believe the exact same rhetoric)
2. Christian.
   I'm gonna go with Catholic because they are particularly rigid and unmoving.
3. A conspiracy theorist on the "anti-Semitic point of no return" scale.

How am I doing so far?

Unfortunately I never did my post on this chart.

I find myself pretty deep into this one as well.
And there are things that are obviously real that are labeled as not.
Most notably 9-11.

In any case blaming everything on a single particular group is not helpful.
Humanity, as a whole, is the problem.
Greed is the problem.
That is the only thing that needs fixing.

_{Loaded question confirmed}