Sir you are writing this on Hive and the aggregate 24h volume for Blurt is listed at $60 right now.
According to the Coingecko I could buy the entire network with a fraction of my Hive stack.

Can you name a single dev that left Hive for Blurt in the last 2 years?
I'd be shocked if there was even one person.

You call Hive a Cabal but Blurt was literally founded on capitalizing on an emergency situation to put the devs who forked it in charge without any regard to how much stake they had. They completely broke the entire stake-based consensus mechanism and pretended like this "solution" was more fair than the Hive distribution. They also couldn't even figure out how to make resource credits work so they just scrapped the entire thing and eventually added fees after a couple of spam attacks forced them to.

I just clicked that link referenced to your quote, and that "quite good writeup" is just an AI prompt that was given a leading narrative to bash Hive? What? That's nuts man.

Sure, downvotes have diminishing returns. The people who support downvotes pretend like there are no downsides, while the people who oppose downvotes pretend like there is no upside. Obviously both sides are wrong.

If Blurt has success, good for them.
I also still have the 16k coins I was airdropped 5 years ago.
Currently worth... $35?

Hive is a tiny tight-knit cultish community.
Blurt can't vampire attack this network.
Nor should it want to, as Hive is such a small/hardened target, why not cast a wider net elsewhere?

This is just the knee-jerk rant that popped into my head upon reading such things.