Cub increased the single pool apr recently and the effect was negligigble.
The effect wasn't negligible at all.
It actually crashed the price even more than it would have otherwise.
You are trying to isolate one variable when three different things happened.
It was obvious that people were going to sell CUB and LEO to participate in the project that had 10000% yields. It did not matter that APR to single staking was increased from 30% to 60% because it's competing with 10000%. In fact it should have been decreased and the LPs increased to add liquidity to the system because we knew there was going to be high volume.
Better yet, don't start the new network with 10000% APR and waste a bunch of money for no reason, pulling in liquidity from CUB and LEO and then bleeding that value out to bots & kingdom whales. This is not rocket science. If you want a sustainable token then make a sustainable token. Opening with 10000% is known to be unsustainable. Stop giving an advantage to people that join within the first five minutes. Stop saying, "Oh don't worry we will make this sustainable later." No, make it sustainable now.
RE: Welcome to my Hatchet-Job: Polycub Liquidity Pools & Sustainability Models