Explain why Binance wouldn't also liquify USDT, the coin with the biggest cap and volume.
Logically that makes zero sense within the given narrative.
'USDT' appears nowhere in this article.
What a surprise. Didn't quite fit in there did it?

Also your title is obvious clickbait.
The definition of rugpull is illegal theft.
Why should anyone take the rest seriously when you bootstrap with an obviously sensationalist lie?

How can you stand there with a straight face, call everything a shitcoin, and then still manage to complain when binance removes assets that you already know are shitcoins from the platform? Make it make sense. Your blog is a constant paradox as always.

Ever stop to consider that perhaps Binance wants more control of stables so they can avoid holding the bags on an asset that systemically collapses? Look at how much shit they had to deal with because of UST. Ever stop to think they are trying to avoid being forced into a similar scenario? Course you didn't. Binance just wants more money and power? No shit that's true for every corporation in existence. Thank you captain obvious. You could literally say that to explain every decision that every corporation has ever made. If that was the real answer they wouldn't have waited this long to do it.

Write a single post with positive constructive undertones.

I dare you.