Someone, who lived alone in the woods could avoid bitcoin.

Now do gunpowder

A person alone in the woods can also avoid gunpowder, and yet those types are the most likely to have a gun for defense and hunting. This person also finds themselves largely defenseless in other ways and can be killed in a thousand times over due to not having access to medical care, like getting taken out by a bacterial infection.

At the end of the day the hermit in the woods didn't avoid society at all and existed at the mercy of the current system in charge. Just because that system might ignore the hermit because the hermit doesn't have any resources that anyone wants doesn't mean they magically avoided the powers that be. As pointed out in the original example: the bigger the organization in question the more forced they are into adopting disruptive technology. The individual in this case is largely irrelevant; just like I have never personally owned a gun. This is why I find the analogy to be so compelling.