Have you considered that this is a 100% inaccurate assessment?

If an LP pumps and then dumps back to the same ratio it is literally impossible to lose money as a liquidity provider. In fact the only possible result from that scenario is profit.

You are really going to try and claim that it's impossible to make money providing liquidity for an LP? I'd say that's not going to age well except it's just dead on arrival.

You are one of the few people here that actually knows what rakeback even is, but your analogy is wildly misleading. LP providers only have to pay the rake one time. The "rakeback" they collect in return can be exponentially more than what they put in (without being a pyramid scheme).

The OP stands. The wrapping fee is a huge gain to the network compared to how it worked before with very little downside. This is the topic of discussion.