RE: RE: Legal will be the biggest winner in the next 4 years because multiple lawsuits awaits
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Legal will be the biggest winner in the next 4 years because multiple lawsuits awaits

Words
282
Reading
2 min
Listen
Play
2y

Is Trumpster Fire a term that people use?

I can't argue with the fact that this is embarrassing and unethical behavior (as if Trump could get any more embarrassing or unethical) but what I find more interesting than all that is that many people in crypto seem to not understand what they signed up for.

Everyone signed up for anarchy... and they don't like it. Everyone signed up for no rules and an infinite number of self-regulating digital communities. Something goes wrong and they tuck tail and demand the "authority" handle it. There is no authority. We are entering a new paradigm where people need to take responsibility and figure their own shit out.

Oh, you got scammed? Ah well... fuck you. Own up to your own fuckup and learn from it. Stop trying to put someone else in charge to fix your problem. It's not going to fly in this lawless jungle we've built. And yes that's harsh and will be a hard lesson for many but it's better than what we had going before.

It looks like Trump is bringing true anarchy to crypto, at least for a short time... which is pretty insane I would actually not have guessed it. The real question is what people are going to do with this freedom. A lot of people are going to scam but at least one person will build something truly legitimate that totally would not have been allowed under the last administration. Will it be worth it? I mean it already has been worth it because the SEC hasn't protected a single person or gotten anyone's money back. Crypto enforcement has been less than worthless since the beginning.

@edicted: Is Trumpster | Ecency