RE: RE: No Paul, It's not Science.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: No Paul, It's not Science.

edicted(83)
Published in
#covid
Words
218
Reading
1 min
6y

Nice find, but this video is hard to take seriously. I watched the whole thing. No one ever made the claim that masks work in both directions. If someone coughs COVID-19 into the air and it gets into your eyes, you get sick.

https://www.webmd.com/lung/news/20200526/can-you-catch-covid19-through-your-eyes#:~:text=%E2%80%9CThe%20virus%20has%20been%20detected,of%20transmission%20mechanism%20could%20occur.%E2%80%9D

“The virus has been detected in tears and conjunctival swab specimens from individuals with COVID-19,” Duh says. “If someone rubs their eyes and then touches someone else or touches a surface, that kind of transmission mechanism could occur.”

The virus is also contained in other body fluids, so assuming that wearing a mask is going to cut transmission by a significant amount seems... dubious. Virus on hand, hand on doornob, hand to eye. Sick.

I mean obviously a mask is going to suppress a sneeze quite a bit. Didn't realize that you want the mask to breath a good amount so air actually travels through it. Makes sense.

So sure masks can work. You know what works better? Doing what I do and staying home all day long with zero interaction of other people :D

Eh, I'm not anti-mask. I just don't care :D. However, it does seem pretty obvious that the numbers are being tweeked and there's a lot of lying going on so no one can distinguish the lies from truth. Bad policy.

@edicted: Nice find, but | Ecency