Is it though? It's funny because if you ask the internets all the governments with full control of the central banks... they are hands down the worst ones with the worst reputations and history. Seems

I have to walk by an apartment with a doorbell camera just to leave or enter my apartment and I've considered destroying it on multiple occasions.

The IRS has been chasing, demanding, and harassing Coinbase for its users’ transactional information for over a year. Coinbase has been receiving a John Doe summons dating back to December 8th, 2016, with

14000 customers... so like less than 1% of their accounts? Clearly they were targeting very specific accounts. which ones?

everything is conditional so it would be dumb to commit to that without looking at what happened there's a lot more information the market can give us this is just the pre-plan

downvoted for aggrandizement

Pretty good advice sometimes you need a reset.

The purpose of this operation is to enable someone to send money contingently to another individual. The funds leave the from account and go into a temporary balance where they are held until from releases

A lot of the functionality can be done with multisignature Hive accounts. Ned/Steemit added Escrow contracts to the chain in a hardfork long past. Nobody uses them but it seems like we should be using

Quickly looked this up and I can't believe that it never comes up when people talk about transactions censorship even though it's just an important detail. I agree I think the issue is very hard to explain

That, is interesting. Could you make my research on that easier by explaining a bit on why that happens? Let's say 99 out of 100 block producers (miners) are actively censoring your transactions with a

lot's of time, energy, and also a lot of risk the thing you build could end up being completely worthless not cool!

Should validators be able to reject transactions? I think a better question is this: Can you prove a validator received a transaction? The short answer: 'no'. And if you could then you would not need a

Pegging debt to BTC is exactly how ThorChain went bankrupt a couple months ago. This is why the value of debt always needs to trend downward or the entire system breaks.

It's no secret that algo stable coins like HBD make Hive more volatile. The stability of HBD is outsourced into increased volatility for Hive. What we require is a volatility derivative that stabilizes

They even mentioned that they've researched hive but the HBD apr was the main thing that "made sense" to them and it just made me wonder if they've researched it enough and if they really "get

That's not really a problem with LEODEX as the MAYA L1 has been absolutely unreliable during this ZCASH integration. It will probably take a while to work out all the kinks.

I'm glad the bull market will be back on in 5 days :D

LEO is listed on MAYA (LEO/CACAO) and MAYA has been constantly shitting the bed because of their ZCASH privacy coin integration. Makes sense because privacy coins are a tough nut to crack. Before that

Yeah I wanted to steer clear of shilling the token :D