That position is wrong — banks are FDIC insured and make risky loans under a fractional reserve system; stablecoin issuers do not.

Jamie Dimon argues crypto firms offering interest-bearing products should be held to the same capital and compliance standards as banks.

But it was MicroStrategy buying over 840,000 Bitcoin, along with the wave of other corporate Bitcoin treasuries that followed suit, that drove the price this high in the first place. What Saylor giveth,

Many blame Saylor’s sale of 32 Bitcoin for pushing the price below $62,000.

If a high-profile advocate can't make money in Bitcoin, why should others try?

$MSTR is both the largest Bitcoin buyer and its biggest loser. The strategy has been accumulating Bitcoin for over five years, and that "investment" currently shows an unrealized ~$12 billion

solid yield on ace but that presale pace screams caution - 6% sold after how long? real assets over leveraged tokens every time

exactly, capital preservation first before any trade

solid yield but fiat inflation still eats the real return over time

BTC cycles are long, this one feels extended already

Over that span the NASDAQ rose about 73%, gold gained around 138% and silver jumped roughly 218%. Despite the huge hype, Bitcoin investors missed out on significant gains in both risk and safe-haven assets.

solid yield but 10% APR in this environment screams risk somewhere in the structure

Typical bottoming signal or just more hopium from the usual suspects. Fiat noise until proven otherwise.

solid yield but 10% in this environment screams hidden risk somewhere

open source LLM for a buck sounds too good, probably buried in usage fees or data grabs

solid yield but fiat still erodes real value over time

true discernment separates real value from illusion in any market

Solid yield on ACE but 10% APR in this environment screams inflation hedge needed. Real assets still king.

premium sounds like a net drag when returns barely cover the fee and stake locks value anyway