Your post on synergy wasn't about just using the Hive BC. It was clearly saying that "dapps" (projects) need to work together to sustain each other.
Now here in your reply to that you're speaking reality, which is that it's very hard for projects to work together and that elitest here guard their work and potential profits.
So my point of 'no actual synergy' is proven even by your own words. Which you again solidify with your statement that YOU DID reach out to 3Speak about the shorts idea but clearly didn't get much of a response back.
Your end statement is a sickness because a metaphorical "forward looking ship" is words that have no meaning other than what the intent attempts:
"Please only praise things, even if they appear to be going nowhere.."
NO.
It's that mentality that gives people like 
ZOMBIES.
I could point out more flaws about Leo but you should read that from your own users. Many comments now openly critique the offerings as not living up to the once hyped up rhetoric.
YOU yourself even state here in this video that only now, you feel happy with threads and that you agree it was hard to use for a long time.
That's low-grade development. NOT going to be attractive to any one other than easily fooled users.
We don't live in the early days of internet. We live in an age where digital platforms are well polished. On top you and others push the claim that Hive does web3 so much better than any other chain...
BUT IT DOESN'T.
That's just clear to anyone that looks deep. Just look how damn long this hard fork from 
This thing has much work to be where people think it should be.
I'm positive to that long term potential... but I'm also not afraid to speak honestly.
Well Hive became a good option for poor countries.. great. That's possibly why power devs want to KILL 'blog rewards' ... and it's irrelevant if some devs don't agree.
So again I ask.... (something you avoided in your reply) .... how can microblogging be sustainable on a chain where 'power devs' think it should never be rewarded?
The coming changes are also going to make your activity more expensive... and so I think you trying to market Threads as an alternative to Twitter is....
Not very thought through.
Twitter: completely free. Large audience.
Threads: a pay to play clone, with a very small audience.
You could only make the above successful with high grade UI development and high throughput backend systems with a rewards mechanism that's sustainable.
You even make that point in your video... that you want the system to be ready for high demand or it will fail.
Hive just doesn't offer that yet. So that's my ultimate point if you see the rest as "complaining".
Anyway that's all my RC.
Maybe delegations will help.
But know this ...
The highly anticipated/(celebrated as going to be highly profitable) RC POOLS flopped before they could even exist.
That's the true Hive vs the sales pitch. Big ideas.... that fall short. This misalignment is clear to many.
RE: What is the Future of Microblogging on Hive?