Last phrase is confusing.

If Hive can continue to build out, we will see a growth rate that exceeds the costs being paid for all this infrastructure.

Wouldn't the cost of users maintaining a network increase also if user growth increases substantially?

How does growth equal cheaper?

What I thought was expected from most users is that if Hive grows then RCs become needed in large amounts making 'RC Delegation' lucrative and people say that the price of Hive will then rise.

So maybe costs of base layer decreases but then layer 2 enterprise pays a premium which could in effect limit growth.