Check out Seycheles. I just reblogged a post that does a good job of looking at it. They actually were doing quite well until after vaccines then things appear to have gotten bad. They were at the time the most vaccinated place on the planet. Though the news out of there has been rather slim since those early announcements of problems.
And if you've looked into mRNA. I went back and read papers from years ago you'll get a pretty good understanding of it.
It is encoded to attach to cells, inject it's instructions which rewrite that cell and then the cell begins producing spike proteins. The cell does not produce more mRNA. So whether the mRNA lasted 1 hour or 100 hours if the cells have been reprogrammed in a sense and are then replicating in the body the mRNA no longer matters.
The only way I know scientifically to stop that replication would be to inject a completely different mRNA that had been designed to somehow reverse the spike protein production initiated by the first. Though I don't know if that is simple or not.
It doesn't really matter at this point WHO you know and what their profession is because nothing like this has ever been used on the public. There is no human precedent so their knowledge, schooling, etc. is irrelevant.
However, the AstraZeneca and Johnson & Johnson vaccines are using the more traditional approaches and are not mRNA based so their experience and knowledge would apply.
My problem is the CDC says that the Spike Protein production would stop after time. I haven't been able to find any proof of that. If you investigate mRNA and how it works that claim doesn't make much sense. Sure the mRNA will be gone, but by then the changes have been made.
Now if they can make cells produce mRNA and then stop cell replication then potentially eventually those cells could die off. Yet that could have some big consequences as well.
Saying there is nothing to worry about when completely new never before tried technology is injected wholesale into the population seems a bit naive.
I know it is the narrative being pushed yet NONE of these people know the long term, or hell even the short term (depending upon what you consider short) consequences of these things.
Now there is growing evidence that unvaccinated people are actually being harmed by the spike proteins shed by the vaccinated (with the mRNA vaccines). The most recent is from the highly prestigous Salk Institute. (reblogged an article someone wrote on that - I'd seen the article but not written anything about it).
This is potentially one of the most important things that may ever happen in our lifetime. Let us hope that is not the case. Yet that is also part of the problem.
They know nothing about long term. The FDA has only released these vaccines under what is known as an EUA (Experimental Use Authorization) and that has very little in the way of protection or oversight. Make no mistake the public is being used for the human trials that would normally occur before any product was used on the public.
RE: Do you remember the saying "Follow the money?"