I dont think its a waste of your time to defend your integrity. Your getting paid by other Hive people for your posts .

There is no guarantee of that and I also do not demand any payment. It is voluntary.

Do you have a problem with that?

I kind of doubt it if you are a patriot.

Yet these days people often suspend their own values when they've decided they want to attack someone.

Sometimes they'll suspend their values when they are trying to attack to save face.

I've been trying to let you come to conclusions on your own:

I'll be blunt and maybe you'll understand:

#1 - I think the videos are important as I stated. I encountered them as I was going through the news. I took the time to find different outlets showing the same information to help resist censorship.

#2 - I don't give one damn whether you agree with me that they are important or not. It's your mind, your choice.

#3 - YOU attacked me with personal attacks in your initial response and NOTHING I had written at that point supported your attacks.

#4 - You've talked about me ignoring you, and deflecting, etc. Yet you've spent a large amount of time doing that.

#5 - You've made yourself look like a fool and I've tried to give you easy outs on that. Yet you keep digging that hole you are standing in. You are not going to turn this around. It is better to either stop, own it, and learn from it.

#6 - I don't want Ray Epps or Stuart Rhodes or anyone else imprisoned or silenced. And YES he was treated differently. Many people have been in prison that were NOT in the building. Most have been released. Yet no one has been charged with insurrection though that is the narrative of the committee. You may not think he was treated differently but if you look at the dates on the articles and videos they ALL predated the twitter tweet that suddenly appears from a committee by quite a bit. They do not put to rest the questions people had before that. Also the trust value of the committee is nonexistent for many of us. Where is the proof of this interview? You seem to trust this tweet as being truth. Selectively choosing to trust this committee when it is convenient to what you personally want to believe.

#7 - I notice you ignored the Benedict Arnold reference. It explained how someone considered above reproach could still go on to be a traitor. NO ONE is above challenge or question. Absolutely NO ONE.

#8 - I do make money off of these posts. Yet I only write when I am inspired. If my goal was to make money I'd post frequently and I'd use the 5 or so other accounts I have that have been inactive for years. The truth is you are just grasping for any straw you can to attack me. You came out the gate that way.

#9 - If me making something is bothering you and you think YOU should be making it. Try writing without attacking people and when you make a mistake own it or at least don't keep pushing it. Over time you'll likely get people that want to up vote your content because they appreciate hearing from you.

#10 - I stopped writing here for about two years. When I came back people thanked me for coming back. I guess some people like it. So who are YOU to decide what other people can value? Like I asked... a communist, or socialist? If you are either of those then don't waste your time I consider those ideologies to be idiotic.

#11 - If YOU happen to be engaged trying to control negative spin and get paid to do it. Knock yourself out. You are doing a really piss poor job of it. In fact you took an article where I didn't share any of my own opinions and you've actually drawn many of them out. Interestingly enough my opinions don't fit the narrative you keep trying to clothe me in.