why is it, if a man 'takes charge of the finances' its "financial abuse"
but if a man works his ass off, and she spends all his money, with no source of income herself
that's perfectly ok?
Read next
why is it, if a man 'takes charge of the finances' its "financial abuse"
but if a man works his ass off, and she spends all his money, with no source of income herself
that's perfectly ok?