You can turn any idea into an "ism" just by defining it. That's why I don't worry about "isms".
It's wrong to use violence against the non-violent and those who are not violating your property, no matter what you call it.

Cooperation and sharing are good, but once you introduce coercion or theft it is no longer good, no matter what your goal is. Again, call it whatever you want, with or without an "ism". The name isn't what matters; the violation is.