Cows protected by borders
Many of my readers lean heavily "conservative" when it comes to "borders". I understand their reasons, even as I reject them on ethical grounds.
But I'm not unreasonable and I'm willing to compromise with them. In fact, I'm offering the borderists a better compromise than I've been offering the anti-gun bigots.
If you can find a realistic way to have the "national borders" you crave without:
- violating the property rights of people (through "taxation") to fund, enforce, and manage the "border",
- without violating the property rights of those who live along that "border",
- without violating the right of association,
- without complicating trade or travel for Americans, and
- without delaying or inconveniencing Americans crossing the "border" in either direction
...then I'll support your efforts in a lukewarm way. I'd rather not single out Americans like I did in those points-- that's why my support would only be lukewarm, but that's my compromise point. Give me more and my support would be stronger.
Until you can do that at a minimum, no deal. Anything else is unethical and I can't support it no matter how "necessary" you claim it is and no matter how you try to justify it.
Thank you for helping support KentforLiberty.com.
Donations and subscriptions are always appreciated!
Find me on Patreon