dsayers

Telling people what they're going to do before they even can do it is provocative, manipulative, and indicates that they cannot have a conversation with you because you're already engaged in a conversation

This is why it is so important that we free the MINDS of the enslaved now. The collapses are coming, all over the world. We NEED for our neighbors to not start clamoring for our next oppressors.

So don't accept their claim of authority over other humans which they are no different from.

Obfuscation. Theft, assault, rape, and murder are internally inconsistent. It's really that simple! The trolley problem is a bullshit trap. The person who COULD intervene did nothing to set up the scenario

I agree with everything you've said, up until the very end here. No drug takes away a person's ability to make proper decisions. Also, the person CHOSE to take that drug, so they would still be responsible

"Who decides these morals" is begging the question. It presumes that morality is subjective. If it were, it would be meaningless, as you attempt to point out. So instead of using that as a reason

The consistency of matter and energy are not human constructs. When you steal, assault, rape, or murder, you are saying "property rights are valid for me and invalid for you." This cannot be

This simply is not true. Everybody owns themselves. Therefore theft, assault, rape, and murder are the simultaneous acceptance AND rejection of property rights. It is objectively true that something cannot

How do you know? Smoking is antithetical to health/life. If a person is not free to smoke, then you're saying that you have greater claim to their body/life than they do, which cannot be universalized.

"The fact that a person doesn't end his life means he chooses to continue living and be alive." This is to say that the absence of one thing is presence of another. Specifically that inaction