I haven't read his transcripts.
But the people who are in the real sex trade with children are not getting any techniques from Andrew Tate. Even if everything you said is true, he's nowhere near what they are.
It's not uncommon for them to purchase infants from their own mothers in some countries.
There is a man who was called John of God in South America, and he was friends with Oprah among other celebrities who called him an amazing man and a faith healer.
He was found to have many women who would give birth to children in what was described as baby factories. Those children would be sold onto the black market with no record of them even being born. This is a man Oprah did stories about, and called her friend.
They often kidnap children as well.
Look no further than the super-wealthy also: Jeffery Epstein(friend of Trump) & Alan Derschowitz (also Trumps friend & lawyer) along with one of the Royal British Princes are all credibly accused of procuring underage girls for sex. Ghislaine Maxwell is serving time right now for trafficking in children.
Trump his-self was also accused by some, and exonerated by others.
None of these people required education from Andrew Tate.
The type of person who pays for Andrew Tate's PHD course are guys who are probably lacking in positive male role models, and angry at women for not dating/sleeping with them.
There are A LOT of young guys in that situation now, and Tate appeals to them.
From what I've seen it's a lot of young guys who idolize him.

I'm not defending him, but I don't think he's the criminal mastermind.
He's not the type of guy who needs to entrap women to make his money.
He's a typical self-obsessed guy hungry for fame. He was on Big Brother...

One thing you said that seems very misguided is about the women digitally prostituting themselves being at risk of getting stalkers.
That's such a strange thing to qualify against him because that's not a real concern in general. IF Tate was actually trafficking women why would digital stalkers even be a concern at all? Thousands of women prostitute themselves on Only Fans, and you can find them on Youtube doing half-naked videos trying to draw people to their Only Fans.
Regular Youtubers would also be at risk of stalkers, and occasionally they are.
But cam-girls don't show enough of their life, and are generally not honest enough with their usually limited audiences to draw stalkers.

It is my opinion that most of what Tate says is a lie. I don't doubt that he's claimed to do many of these things he's said. I'm saying he would lie about the things he's doing to appear like more of a mastermind than he actually is.
But there have been multiple women who did the cam work for him that have come forth to defend him.
Including the girl he's "beating" with a belt and all that in the one video that I've seen. She's playing a role in that video, and it's not uncommon for women to enjoy that sort of thing. In that video, doing it for the camera it's obviously a role-playing thing.
But there are lots of women who enjoy that sort of thing in private, and would never let the same man treat them with any disrespect outside of the bedroom yet demand it happen inside of one.

I will say it right now. Tate is not going to prison. Whether he's guilty or not.
Either the entire thing is staged to get him more attention, or the Romanian government is shaking him down for money.
I will be very surprised if he becomes convicted.
Since his "release" he's done interviews with Tucker Carlson, Patrick Bet David, and many other high-profile hosts. To me it looks like a very clever publicity stunt, and it may be difficult to hoax an arrest & imprisonment in many nations. But in Romania perhaps that sort of thing could be purchased? I don't know, that is my speculation.