Sam, I had a look at the study that was "translated into English" by an unknown source, and then posted by rocksivante. The unknown source asked readers to disregard the study, and trust his translation of it, because the study is long and complicated. Well, I went and read (skimmed) it, and right away found where the person went wrong. They mistranslated "study intervention" (which actually refers to the so-called vaccine) to "vaccine test subject". This caused a number of cascading incorrect assumptions and misunderstandings because everything was based on that error.
I do believe something is going on here with transmission of side effects to unjabbed people, but that post isn't evidence of that, and in fact appears to be spreading disinfo that could discredit our cause.
Just my take, please let me know what you think. No offense is meant to anyone. Thanks :)
RE: What can the unvaccinated do to protect themselves from the vaccinated?