I'm not focused on that, that's just one of many problems with it.

"A link where a video was removed for YT community violations, isn't proof? LOL. Ok. It's not proof of value, but proof it was censored."

I have several such links to my YT productions that have been removed for various reasons. Correct, it's not proof of anything. I don't think this video was censored. I think it was SAID TO BE censored, to create a buzz.

And I think it's full of stuff we already knew, being said by actors, to a paid photographer made to look amateur.

Like I said before, some of what they say is correct, but that means literally nothing except that some of what they said is true. Some of what the mainstream puts out is true, too.... it means nothing about the source.