"Int their infinite wisdom, "leaders" and "health professionals" have declared that 12 non-protesters are equally as "deadly" as 100 protesters. Makes total sense."

Well, that's not really what they're saying or implying.... it's a strawman. Your argument is sound without resorting to intellectual dishonesty IMO. That's stooping to their level.

I do think protests should be less limited than social gatherings. Social gatherings, while important, can be delayed. Protest can't, as it is one of our only means of addressing grievances, of which there are many. We should be protesting the lockdown, the social engineering, the bailouts, the corruption, the cashless society, the fraud of MSM and medical journals, etc etc. We should also protest the 100 people limit, as it is unconstitutional and not based in any science or logic.