This is an email I recently wrote to Chuck Fall of the Truth Action Project regarding his comments about the technology that turned the towers almost completely to dust in mid-air on 9/11.
Thanks to 
Hello, Chuck Fall,
I listened to your TAP talk with Bob Greenyer.
https://rumble.com/v78pcmq-tap-talk-raw-cut-with-bob-greenyer.html#
You were wondering why you hadn't heard of this technology before. It's the same reason why you haven't read my book. ;-) Had you read my book, you would have learned about all of this. I have a chapter about Tesla, Ed Leedskalnin, Thomas Townsend Brown, Project Winterhaven, John Hutchison, round holes in glass, LENR, EVOs and charge clusters, etc. In 2008, I visited John Hutchison and his "home lab" a couple of times. I also visited Ken Shoulders. There is a picture from Ken Shoulders on page 357 of my book. After I published my book in 2010, I sent a copy to Ken Shoulders. He responded with "you've got it!" among other comments. I received a similar comment from Thomas Bearden, as well. Several other well-known people in the LENR community also read my book.
And on page 357 I comment that the energetics of these technologies have a common basis in electron clustering.
I also cover tornadoes and other weather events. There is a lot we can learn from nature.
I think I was the first person to talk about the Bible in the 9/11 museum. On my old website, I even had a video of Pope Francis visiting the Bible. September 25, 2015. I commented how interesting it was that he would not make eye contact with the Bible. It was weird how he would not look at it.
Also know that I have a background in optical interferometry. So it is second nature to me to realize there can be zones of constructive interference and destructive interference. And knowing John Hutchison interferes radio-frequency energy within a static field, I know that this could be done.
In Chapter 15, I discuss the dust., including "iron-rich microspheres."
Also, you may be interested in the dust studies shown on page 371. They imply transmutation, particularly to zinc, in the dust samples from Bankers Trust that went into the decision to take down Bankers Trust after they repaired it.
Also on page 371 is a microscope image of an alumino-silicate particle in the dust that had holes in it.
Early on, and knowing my background, Steven Jones knew I'd figure it out. So to keep the cover up safe for as long as possible, there was a great campaign to marginalize me and destroy my reputation in the eyes of the Truther community. The vetting manual for AE911Truth was instructions to search the internet for the name of the AE911Truth applicant with the name, "Judy Wood." Any applicant found on the same website as "Judy Wood" banned them from membership. No other name was to be checked for. Members who posted any of the evidence I discussed were banned from AE911Truth. The same thing for anyone who discussed my Qui Tam case. The AE911Truth website first went up 3 weeks AFTER I filed my RFC to NIST. My name was also Block-listed on Wikipedia, beginning in 2006.
And think about why you said, "the whole Judy Wood enchilada."
Would you have said that about anyone else?
Many people have been trained to ignore or denigrate anything I say.
After all, you wouldn't have heard it if I had been presenting it, you needed someone else to present this in order to hear it.
Do you think this is all coincidence? ;-)
It's how cover-ups work.
Remember, my book was published in 2010. It's been available for more than 15 years. The free-energy information is in there and has been all along. Again, you wondered how this has been covered up. It's called perception management.
The evidence of what happened to Hiroshima August 6, 1945, is evidence we could have nuclear power plants.
The evidence of what happened to the WTC on September 11, 2001, is evidence we can have free energy. That is what the title of my book means. The evidence in my book is evidence we can have free-energy technology. It was demonstrated to the entire planet. They probably thought few would understand what they were looking at. And if someone did recognize what happened, they likely assumed such a person could be easily marginalized.
You kept asking how this remained covered up. I have a cute story in my book, Chapter 16.5, about how they covered up the first jet airplanes in World War 2. While parked on the ground, they put a fake propeller on it so people wouldn't realize what they were looking at. When my dad read my book, he realized he had seen the jet aircraft while he was stationed at the same air base during WWII. He remembered thinking the propeller looked like planks from a wooden fence, but then went on to other things and didn't question it further. If people don't know what they are looking at, they don't see it -- especially if they are told to see something else. Ridicule is also a useful tool for covering up what someone is saying.
The most tragic part of 9/11 is that there are 1,100 - 1,500 missing people where there wasn't even DNA identification. The people were dustified. These missing people aren't discussed because that would require acknowledgement that these human beings were dustified. And that also remains covered up.... that there is a technology that can dustify human beings.
Tesla wanted to give free energy to the world, but he was afraid it would be used for evil purposes. Well, been there, done that. So now why not use if for good?
Do you want a new investigation? Today is your lucky day!
https://tinyurl.com/JudyWood-amazon
The movie, Irrefutable:
https://tinyurl.com/janedoe0911
Dr. Wood
