Let's set a limit like the highest moral income. It would be unforgivable not to give up when this limit is exceeded. For example, let's say 50 thousand or 100 thousand per person. Let's give 50 grand for every kid. That means a single-child family can earn $ 250,000.
You can stay with this amount, which is quite high. However, everybody who has earned more is obliged to give the superior. Rejecting referrals means deliberately allowing others to suffer. This is a proposition that is valid at the outset, regardless of whether you "earn" or "earn" your income.
I think the highest moral income is lower, but let's set a limit here for everyone to agree. I think that the moral requirements are practically sustainable. A $ 30,000 limit will cause people to live some deprivations, but a $ 100,000 limit will undoubtedly give you a more comfortable life at an amazing rate than any character in history.
