This burden and sacrifice are blasphemously compared with the static victims based on their gender and the responsibilities delegated to them.

I do concur with you, but statistics don't care about emotions and suffering, they only show specific numbers about specific things. Now if you come to me and say that women suffered emotionally more than men, I may agree with this as well since women aren't suited for war. We need to put a clear line between statistics, and emotions. Jews are saying that they are the people who suffered the most during WW2, and you can go to jail in certain countries if you say the opposite thing. Suffering can't be quantified, but historical events can, and statistics can play a role in showing some aspects of the war.

Russian women of the Second World War are not only the background and nurses. They worked in factories, were snipers and scouts.

I agree that's why I said mostly, and not only. It's all about the numbers/percentages. Everyone was affected by the war, but statically speaking, casualties by gender differ that's all.

and suffered no less.

Again, this isn't a competition, I don't want to reach a point where people fight over whose suffering is the most important, 1,000,000 men or 1,000,000 women.

love of husbands a worthy cause.

Not quite sure if you feel in love before, but I find it quite surprising. If women won't go to war for love, men will definitely do it. Maybe we are just stupid, but this is who we are.

Oh yes, I forgot that war is the lot of men, and women are just an extreme necessity. Don't you think that sounds a bit limited?

Why are you saying this like if we are leaving you behind? while in reality, men do it to keep women safe.

I don’t think that with the elegance and love of husbands, my people would be able to triumph over the enemy and cleanse their lands.

I ain't complaining, everyone has his own reasons to fight, I did mention love only in the case of Mariya Oktyabrskaya. Just to be precise.

I don’t know what offended you so much

Yea, I am so offended by your madness.

Just kidding =)

But this once again puts you in your frame and makes you forget that each of us is individual and is simply a person, not a character who suits beautiful behaviors or tries to imitate someone.

That's why feminists hate statistics and biology, saying "each of us is individual and is simply a person" and "not a character who suits beautiful behaviors or tries to imitate someone" isn't going to change scientific facts. I think you mixed personality with femininity, all women are different.

I understand that women are now victims of a perverse culture, society is always pressuring women to accord with specific standards of beauty and other things ... hence the need for women to define femininity, instead of pushing girls to the abyss of gender fluidity and non-binary madness. If you leave the space empty for anyone to fill, then a person with short blue hair will fill it for you.

P.S: Russia will always hold a special place in my heart, even though I'm just a foreigner.