RE: RE: Mate in 3 [KRBP vs kqr] Explained (CGCP 00238)
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Mate in 3 [KRBP vs kqr] Explained (CGCP 00238)

double-negative(52)
Published in
#chess
Words
16
Reading
1 min
Listen
Play
8y

I first saw the Rxc5+ variation, which your analysis says is a mate in 5. Nice puzzle!

via dtube
This post was published via dtube. Ecency is not the originator or editor of this content and displays it for discovery purposes only.
1
@double-negative: I first saw the | Ecency