RE: RE: Steemit freewrite; leveling up and voting down!
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Steemit freewrite; leveling up and voting down!

Words
264
Reading
2 min
Listen
Play
7y

Congratulation for 73 Reputation

I think it's not just about supporting new users, it's imposing opinions and harassing people the wrong way. Just let someone show me the answers and facts to these questions because there are no successful bloggers without voting from the same group of people.

This is yours

By this principle, no one should vote on your post every day, although you have good posts, even though we love you, we should only vote for new people. If everyone does it and only dobartim and some other people get downvotes, then what is the point here?

Voting for other great bloggers or for a large number of small bloggers comes down to the same point, the exchange of votes.

As much as we support small users, this does not mean that Steem will grow, because we have a limit in support.

There is no negative campaign like now downvote that leads us to a positive end to end solution.

Social networking means that I choose the people I like, who I understand, and not vote random all in a row, then there is no need to write posts.

There are no successful bloggers who are not supported by the same group of people who have Steem Power. Give me a list and show me that percentage.

This is a picture showing those who support you, interestingly I am right in this example as well.

I will always support you because you are a quality person and have good posts, and if anyone resents it, this is his problem and not mine.

@dobartim: Congratulation | Ecency