This is the opposite, I want to help real users, those who invest in Steem, who write good posts and who have the right to their thoughts. Minis are legal, only this mode of action is not the right one because it all comes down to manipulations and stories. Why is it not mentioned that I donated a minimum of $ 30,000 to those who have no money, that I have taught many people how to become successful on Steemit. We can't judge someone by just one detail, I changed my voting policy but that didn't suffice for you, now you have to tell me who I can vote for, who should I vote for in order to be good? I am always for change, I am always for better, but I am never for false patriots and those who are not honest. We need to consider what a positive campaign is, how to extend our earnings limit, how to truly have quality, not lobby groups that push their policies and do not want to hear from anyone. Highlight all the posts on the trending page that really deserve so much reward? Explain to me how good they are, why they are quality because I see that it is only a small number of authors, a small number with truly remarkable posts that we can admire, and which attract the attention of new users. I wonder when we support those who have low earnings in the post, my vote is weak, and when I give a voice to someone who has high earnings, my vote is strong.
It's not a motive that supports those who don't have Steem Power, it's a system that supports lobby groups and their users, not the quality we're talking about. In the end, it doesn't matter who we are talking to, who we are giving minuses too, it turns out to be the essence of the bypass, and form is respected.