Now that we officially have Justice Kavanaugh sworn in, we can look back at this failed deepstate ploy years later as a potentially huge turning point.
The deepstate/cabal whatever you want to call them, have their greasy hands all over manipulating politicians, media and three letter agencies. What we saw with Kavanaugh was a huge manipulation attempt to throw the public in a frenzy and through mob tactics have certain senators back away from supporting Kavanaugh or have Kavanaugh himself step away.
Does this have something to do with white hats trying to take back control over the supreme court and other judicial courts and what would start happening once the judicial system is no longer corrupt and in the control of this deepstate.
Kavanaugh has showed support for the legality of military trials of civilians during times of war, in his opinion since the 9/11 attack, the US has remained in this state of war.
Its interesting that Senator Lindsey Graham during confirmation hearings asks Kavanaugh questions that lead into military law and military tribunals
[Graham] Let’s talk about the law and war. Is there a body of law called the law of armed conflict?
[Kavanaugh] There is such a body Senator.
[Graham] Is there a body of law that’s called basic criminal law?
[Kavanaugh] Yes, Senator.
[Graham] Are there differences between those two bodies of law?
[Kavanaugh] Yes, Senator.
[Graham] From an American citizen’s point of view, do your constitutional rights follow you? If you’re in Paris, does the Fourth Amendment protect you as an American from your own government?
[Kavanaugh] Yes.
[Graham] So, if you’re in Afghanistan, do your constitutional rights protect you against your own government?
[Kavanaugh] If you’re an American in Afghanistan you have constitutional rights as against the US government…. That’s long settled law.
[Graham] Isn’t there also long settled law, and it goes back to the Eisenstraighter case, I can’t remember the name of it.
[Kavanaugh] Johnson versus Eisentrager.
[Graham] Right, that American citizens who collaborate with the enemy are considered enemy combatants.
[Kavanaugh] They can be.
[Graham] Can be?
[Kavanaugh] They can be, they’re often, they’re sometimes, criminally prosecuted, sometimes treated in the military …
[Graham] Let’s talk about can be, I think the …
[Kavanaugh] Under Supreme Court precedent.
[Graham] Right, from, again there’s a Supreme Court decision that said that American citizens who collaborated with Nazi saboteurs were tried by the military. Is that correct?
[Kavanaugh] That is correct.
[Graham] I think a couple of them were executed.
[Kavanaugh] Yeah
[Graham] So, if anybody doubts there’s a long-standing history in this country that your constitutional rights follow you wherever you go but you don’t have a constitutional right to turn on your own government, collaborate with the enemy of the nation. You’ll be treated differently.
SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION FOR USE OF UNITED STATES ARMED FORCES.
(a) IN GENERAL.—That the President is authorized to use all necessary and appropriate force against those nations, organizations, or persons he determines planned, authorized, committed, or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001, or harbored such organizations or persons, in order to prevent any future acts of international terrorism against the United States by such nations, organizations or persons.
So it so happens that all these topics came out of nowhere during the hearings, not usual questions and yet mainstream media didnt ever follow up as to why this topic came up.
I wont go over in great detail as to why Dr. Ford had zero case against Kavanaugh, but basically here you go=
Zero corroborating witnesses
Zero Evidence
No specifics to the place and time of crime location
Polygraph test only asked 2 questions and non dealt with Kavanaugh himself
Ford lied about having a fear of planes and said that no one told her the hearings could be done in her home state. Both of these statement were lies and she was under oath.
With Ford I think there are only 2 scenarios behind this.
One is that she is knowingly and willingly lying about this for many reasons I will let you all come to your own obvious conclusions
Two she was indeed sexually assaulted, but it was not by Kavanaugh. But this assault was used by people manipulating her or again with her collusion, to drag Kavanaugh 's name into this and lead to his ouster from the supreme court.
All I can say is that now we have almost 56,000 sealed indictments! Think about that number for a moment, when in an average year only 1,000 is the norm. There is definitely something going on and I think now that the supreme court has less corrupt judges, real justice can be done.
The great researcher Dr. Michael Salla goes into details on this whole things as well within his article
https://www.exopolitics.org/is-kavanaugh-confirmation-being-sabotaged-to-delay-military-trials-of-deep-state/
Time will tell, but I think we will be in for a red October and lots of things developing before years end!
