Just as you aren't responsible for Trump or the Senate's actions, I can't be held responsible for any politician or (fickle) "ally" that you don't like (nor should entire groups be smeared by the actions of a small number of individuals UNLESS they hold high positions in that group). I can only be held responsible for the consistency of my beliefs and my actions.
I feel VERY free to slam the Senate when the rules change based upon circumstance but you can't do anything about that -- unless you express your approval (which I feel is an endorsement for lacking integrity and I will criticize you for). I feel VERY free to slam Trump when he constantly, if nothing else, makes claims that are highly improbable at best -- but don't criticize you unless you criticize Biden for doing with far greater justification what Trump has done far more egregiously without mentioning that fact -- that is a rhetorical game, not honest debate.
I feel free to point out inconsistencies and lack of INTERNAL integrity of the arguments and actions of others -- and expect that others should hold me accountable in exactly the same way. This is why I criticize people who show every sign of believing that the vote results were indicative of the will of a state -- yet call for it to be overturned regardless of this fact. The fact that something CAN be done does not mean that it should be supported just because it fits your immediate desires. I will repeat that I find such shenanigans and lack of integrity between belief and action despicable, reprehensible, disgusting and sickening (and note that you continue to avoid denying that this is exactly what you are doing).
Again, that has zero to do with your political views except their consistency and the integrity of your actions (counting discourse as an action) with what you believe to be the truth (that eliminating the fraud would not flip the results).
RE: Will a 50-state United States exist in 2022?